Review and Update Courses Supporting Continuing Education For Primary Care

Thermal Imaging in Wound Healing: Monitoring Diabetic and Vascular Ulcers

Introduction

Chronic wounds such as diabetic foot ulcers and vascular ulcers pose a serious health challenge, often leading to infections, hospitalizations, and even amputations if not managed promptly ( Is Thermal Imaging a Useful Predictor of the Healing Status of Diabetes-Related Foot Ulcers? A Pilot Study - PMC ) ( Is Thermal Imaging a Useful Predictor of the Healing Status of Diabetes-Related Foot Ulcers? A Pilot Study - PMC ). Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) affect up to 4–10% of people with diabetes worldwide, with a lifetime risk of 19–34% for those patients ( Is Thermal Imaging a Useful Predictor of the Healing Status of Diabetes-Related Foot Ulcers? A Pilot Study - PMC ). Many DFUs fail to heal within 12 weeks of standard care, resulting in complications like infection or limb amputation ( Is Thermal Imaging a Useful Predictor of the Healing Status of Diabetes-Related Foot Ulcers? A Pilot Study - PMC ). Vascular ulcers, including venous stasis ulcers and arterial ulcers from peripheral arterial disease, are similarly stubborn wounds caused by poor circulation or blood pooling, and they can likewise lead to severe complications. Early detection of issues in these wounds and close monitoring of healing are critical to prevent deterioration. However, traditional wound assessment—visual inspection and simple measurements of wound size—can be imprecise and slow. Clinicians often must “monitor the ulcer for over 4 weeks” before determining if it is healing adequately, causing “an undesirable delay” in adjusting treatment ( Is Thermal Imaging a Useful Predictor of the Healing Status of Diabetes-Related Foot Ulcers? A Pilot Study - PMC ). This lag in decision-making can allow a treatable problem to progress.

Thermal imaging (also known as infrared thermography) has emerged as a promising tool to address this gap. Thermal imaging uses infrared cameras to detect the skin’s surface temperature, producing color-coded images of heat patterns. In wound care, these thermal patterns can reveal underlying physiological changes: areas of increased heat often indicate inflammation or infection, whereas cooler areas may signal reduced blood flow ( Is Thermal Imaging a Useful Predictor of the Healing Status of Diabetes-Related Foot Ulcers? A Pilot Study - PMC ). Because it is a non-contact, non-invasive technique, thermal imaging can be performed safely and painlessly in clinical settings or even at the bedside. By incorporating temperature data with visual wound assessments, clinicians can gain early clues about a wound’s condition that might not be visible to the naked eye. This article advocates for the use of thermal imaging in monitoring wound healing progression—specifically for diabetic ulcers and vascular ulcers—and discusses how it can detect early signs of complications, track healing progress, and ultimately improve patient outcomes. It will also outline the current limitations of thermal imaging, such as cost and accessibility, and highlight companies at the forefront of bringing this technology into everyday wound care practice.

Understanding Thermal Imaging in Wound Care

Thermal imaging involves using an infrared camera to measure the natural infrared radiation (heat) emitted from the skin. The result is a thermogram: an image where different temperatures are mapped to different colors (for example, hotter areas might appear red or white, and cooler areas blue or purple). In wound care, a thermogram of an ulcer and the surrounding skin (often called the periwound area) can provide valuable insights into the wound’s status. Increased temperature in or around a wound typically signifies increased blood flow and metabolic activity, which can occur due to inflammation or infection as the body mounts an immune response (ThermoHuman) (ThermoHuman). Conversely, abnormally low temperatures in the wound bed might indicate poor perfusion (inadequate blood circulation) or extensive tissue necrosis, since blood flow is a major source of heat in tissue (ThermoHuman). In other words, thermography allows clinicians to visualize two critical factors for healing: the presence of inflammation (too much can mean infection, too little may mean poor healing response) and the adequacy of circulation.

Importantly, thermal imaging provides quantitative, objective data rather than relying solely on subjective observation of wound appearance. A clinician using an infrared camera can detect a temperature difference of even a degree or two, which might not be noticeable just by touch. For instance, a normal symmetric thermal pattern between left and right feet is expected in a healthy individual; a “hot spot” on one foot but not the other could be an early warning sign of a developing problem in patients with diabetes ( Is Thermal Imaging a Useful Predictor of the Healing Status of Diabetes-Related Foot Ulcers? A Pilot Study - PMC ). In fact, previous studies established that a temperature difference of about 2.2°C between corresponding spots on the two feet is a sign of abnormality in circulation or impending ulceration in diabetic patients ( Is Thermal Imaging a Useful Predictor of the Healing Status of Diabetes-Related Foot Ulcers? A Pilot Study - PMC ). This principle is already used in practice: daily foot temperature monitoring for people with diabetic neuropathy is recommended by international guidelines to catch foot injuries early, since rises in skin temperature precede ulceration (Using Thermometry for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Prevention) (Using Thermometry for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Prevention). Thermal imaging extends this concept by creating a full map of temperature distribution, which is especially useful for monitoring an existing wound’s healing process or flagging zones at risk around an ulcer. In diabetic foot ulcers, thermography can incorporate both the wound’s area and its temperature profile, offering a more comprehensive picture of healing than wound size alone (Thermal imaging improves diabetes related foot ulcer assessment). In vascular ulcers (such as venous ulcers), thermography can highlight areas of chronic inflammation (often warmer periwound skin in venous ulcers) as well as areas of inadequate perfusion (cooler regions due to arterial insufficiency) (ThermoHuman) (ThermoHuman). This information helps clinicians understand the underlying causes hindering healing and tailor interventions accordingly.

Benefits of Thermal Imaging for Wound Monitoring

Early Detection of Complications

(VA’s Remote Temperature Monitoring Program Prevents Diabetic Limb Loss | Connected Care) Thermal imaging systems can reveal heat patterns in the feet of high-risk patients. In this example, a thermographic foot scan highlights areas of elevated temperature (red hotspots) on the soles, which may indicate inflammation or a developing ulcer before it becomes visible. Early detection is perhaps the most significant advantage of thermal imaging in wound care. Many complications in wound healing are preceded by subtle physiological changes that manifest as temperature abnormalities. For diabetic foot ulcers, a localized increase in temperature often signals inflammation or infection well before noticeable redness or discharge appears on exam (ThermoHuman) (ThermoHuman). Thermal imaging can thus unmask “silent” infections or deep tissue involvement that might be missed by surface observation alone. For example, if a normally healing ulcer suddenly shows a temperature spike at the wound or surrounding skin, it could indicate an infection brewing beneath the surface. Catching this early allows for prompt intervention (such as starting antibiotics or draining an abscess) before the infection worsens. Research has demonstrated that infrared thermography can identify areas of high temperature in the diabetic foot that correlate with osteomyelitis (bone infection) or deep tissue inflammation, even when the skin looks intact (ThermoHuman). In fact, one study noted that thermography detected signs of complications in diabetic foot ulcers weeks in advance of clinical symptoms, giving clinicians a crucial head start in treatment (Thermal imaging improves diabetes related foot ulcer assessment) (Thermal imaging improves diabetes related foot ulcer assessment).

In addition to detecting infection, thermal imaging can predict ulcer formation. Patients with peripheral neuropathy (nerve damage from diabetes) often cannot feel developing injuries, but their feet exhibit characteristic thermal changes. If one area of the foot becomes consistently warmer than the same spot on the opposite foot, it often indicates excessive pressure or trauma (for instance, from ill-fitting shoes) and impending skin breakdown. Using this principle, remote temperature monitoring devices have been developed to prevent ulcers. A notable example is the Podimetrics SmartMat used in Veterans Affairs clinics: patients stand on this electronic mat daily, and it measures foot temperatures. The system can detect inflammation and tissue stress and has been shown to identify diabetic foot ulcers up to 5 weeks before they clinically appear (VA’s Remote Temperature Monitoring Program Prevents Diabetic Limb Loss | Connected Care) (VA’s Remote Temperature Monitoring Program Prevents Diabetic Limb Loss | Connected Care). This early warning enables preventive measures (offloading pressure, examining the foot) to stop an ulcer from fully developing. Similarly, smart wearable devices like Siren’s temperature-sensing socks continuously monitor foot skin temperature and alert users to potential injuries. These socks have multiple built-in sensors that send data to a smartphone app; if one part of the foot shows a concerning temperature rise, the user and care team are notified to check for a blister or irritation (Smart Socks to Catch Foot Injuries Early | DiaTribe) (Smart Socks to Catch Foot Injuries Early | DiaTribe). Early detection through such thermographic monitoring significantly reduces the incidence of severe ulcers and subsequent amputations by allowing timely intervention.

Thermal imaging also aids in vascular ulcer management by signaling early complications like cellulitis (a spreading skin infection) or ischemia. Venous leg ulcers often have surrounding skin that is inflamed; a sudden expansion of a warm area around a venous ulcer on a thermogram might indicate the onset of cellulitis (infection of skin tissue) even before the redness and swelling become pronounced. On the other hand, an arterial ulcer (caused by poor arterial blood flow) might show an extremely cool periphery on thermal images, flagging areas that are not getting enough perfusion. If those areas start to cool further or enlarge, it could suggest worsening circulation requiring urgent vascular intervention. In essence, by making invisible thermal changes visible, infrared imaging serves as an early warning system for wound clinicians. It helps differentiate between mere inflammation (which is part of normal healing) and problematic infection or perfusion issues that need action (New pocket-sized device to quickly spot infected wounds • healthcare-in-europe.com) (New pocket-sized device to quickly spot infected wounds • healthcare-in-europe.com). As Dr. Jose Ramirez-GarciaLuna noted, “thermography provides insight into the inflammatory and circulatory changes happening under the skin”, which complements other diagnostic information (New pocket-sized device to quickly spot infected wounds • healthcare-in-europe.com). This capability to detect trouble early is crucial in preventing minor issues from escalating into major complications.

Monitoring Healing Progression

Beyond spotting complications, thermal imaging is a valuable tool for tracking the healing trajectory of wounds over time. In standard practice, the primary measure of healing is a reduction in wound size—clinicians often compare wound area at week 1 and week 4, looking for a 50% reduction as a positive sign (Thermal imaging improves diabetes related foot ulcer assessment) ( Is Thermal Imaging a Useful Predictor of the Healing Status of Diabetes-Related Foot Ulcers? A Pilot Study - PMC ). However, sole reliance on size can be misleading, as some wounds may not shrink much in the early weeks despite healthy healing (for example, if they are filling in depth), while others might superficially shrink yet harbor persistent infection. Thermal imaging adds an extra dimension to monitoring by capturing the wound’s physiological activity. A wound that is healing appropriately tends to show a gradual decline in temperature toward normal skin levels as inflammation subsides and new tissue fills in (ThermoHuman) (ThermoHuman). Conversely, a wound that remains hot or becomes hotter over time is a red flag for stalled healing or infection. By taking serial thermal images at each visit, clinicians can quantitatively assess whether a wound’s temperature profile is moving in the right direction.

Studies have shown that thermal parameters can predict healing outcomes earlier than visual assessment. For instance, a pilot study of diabetic foot ulcers found that by week 2 of treatment, healing ulcers had a significantly smaller “hot area” (isothermal region) on thermal images compared to non-healing ulcers ( Is Thermal Imaging a Useful Predictor of the Healing Status of Diabetes-Related Foot Ulcers? A Pilot Study - PMC ) ( Update on the Use of Infrared Thermography in the Early Detection of Diabetic Foot Complications: A Bibliographic Review - PMC ). This reduction in the warm wound area correlated with eventual wound closure by week 12, whereas ulcers that failed to heal maintained larger warm areas ( Update on the Use of Infrared Thermography in the Early Detection of Diabetic Foot Complications: A Bibliographic Review - PMC ). The ability to forecast at week 2 which wounds were on track to heal versus those lagging is tremendously helpful. Clinicians can intensify or change therapy early for wounds predicted to be non-healing (e.g., switch to advanced dressings, initiate growth factors, or consider surgical options) rather than waiting an entire month to see insufficient progress ( Is Thermal Imaging a Useful Predictor of the Healing Status of Diabetes-Related Foot Ulcers? A Pilot Study - PMC ) (Thermal imaging improves diabetes related foot ulcer assessment). Thermal imaging essentially provides a real-time feedback mechanism: as treatments are applied (such as debridement, antibiotics, or offloading), subsequent thermograms show the physiological response. A decreasing temperature trend suggests the treatment is effective (inflammation is resolving), whereas persistently high or rising temperatures might prompt a re-evaluation of the approach.

In vascular ulcers, monitoring with thermal imaging can guide therapy as well. Consider an ischemic ulcer (due to arterial disease) in a patient who undergoes a revascularization procedure to improve blood flow. A comparative thermogram before and after revascularization can objectively demonstrate increased skin temperature in the once-cool regions, confirming improved circulation to the wound area (ThermoHuman). This can be more immediate and illustrative than waiting for the wound to visibly start healing. Similarly, in venous ulcers, as compression therapy reduces edema and inflammation, one would expect to see the excess heat in the periwound area diminish week by week on thermal images. If that doesn’t happen, it might indicate persistent venous hypertension or need for adjusted compression. Thermal imaging can also evaluate the effect of various wound dressings or devices; for example, a dressing that is too occlusive might cause an unwanted heat buildup (sign of inflammation), whereas an optimal dressing keeps the wound in a more moderate thermal range (ThermoHuman). By integrating thermal imaging into regular wound assessments, healthcare providers get a dynamic picture of healing: not just how the wound looks, but how it’s functioning beneath the surface. This leads to more informed clinical decisions, such as continuing the current plan versus intervening sooner.

Improving Patient Outcomes

The ultimate goal of any monitoring technology is to improve patient outcomes, and thermal imaging holds strong promise in this regard. By detecting complications early and allowing proactive management, thermal imaging can reduce the incidence of severe infections, hospital admissions, and amputations for patients with diabetic and vascular ulcers. Studies have suggested that incorporating temperature monitoring into diabetic foot care significantly lowers rates of ulcer recurrence and related surgeries (VA’s Remote Temperature Monitoring Program Prevents Diabetic Limb Loss | Connected Care) (VA’s Remote Temperature Monitoring Program Prevents Diabetic Limb Loss | Connected Care). If a developing problem is caught 4–5 weeks earlier, as thermal systems have demonstrated in DFUs (VA’s Remote Temperature Monitoring Program Prevents Diabetic Limb Loss | Connected Care), then clinicians can intervene when the issue is more easily treatable. This might mean the difference between resolving an infection with oral antibiotics at home versus requiring an invasive surgery or a prolonged hospital stay for sepsis later. Over time, such preventive care translates to improved limb salvage rates and quality of life. Patients avoid the pain and disability associated with advanced wounds and procedures. In diabetic foot management, the use of daily thermography (through mats or socks) has been associated with fewer high-grade ulcers and fewer amputations, essentially by nipping problems in the bud (VA’s Remote Temperature Monitoring Program Prevents Diabetic Limb Loss | Connected Care) (Using Thermometry for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Prevention).

Thermal imaging also contributes to better outcomes by optimizing the healing process. When clinicians can clearly see that a wound is not responding (via thermal cues of persistent inflammation or expanding cool, necrotic zones), they can escalate treatment or refer to specialists sooner. This targeted approach prevents patients from “falling through the cracks” with a wound that quietly worsens despite weekly check-ups. Conversely, if thermal imaging shows a wound’s heat and inflammation have normalized, it gives confidence that the wound is on the right track, potentially avoiding unnecessary aggressive interventions. Another aspect of patient outcomes is cost-effectiveness and convenience. Thermal imaging is quick (images are captured in seconds) and painless, which improves patient compliance with monitoring. It can be done in home care settings with portable devices, reducing the need for frequent clinic visits for wound checks. Earlier healing and complication prevention also mean lower overall healthcare costs and less burden on patients and caregivers in terms of treatment logistics (Using Thermometry for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Prevention) (Using Thermometry for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Prevention). Moreover, because thermal imaging is objective, it can enhance communication and decision-making in the care team. Wound progression (or lack thereof) can be documented in thermal photos that all clinicians involved – doctors, nurses, podiatrists, vascular surgeons – can review, ensuring everyone has a consistent understanding of the wound’s status. This collaborative clarity can lead to timely, coordinated interventions that improve healing outcomes.

In summary, thermal imaging improves patient outcomes by enabling preventive care, guiding personalized treatments, and shortening the time to heal. When used alongside standard wound management, it acts as an early surveillance system and a progress report card, both of which are key to successful healing of chronic diabetic and vascular ulcers. Ultimately, the measure of success is fewer infected wounds, preserved limbs, and healed ulcers – all metrics that thermal imaging-based strategies are showing improvements in according to emerging clinical evidence (Thermal imaging improves diabetes related foot ulcer assessment) (VA’s Remote Temperature Monitoring Program Prevents Diabetic Limb Loss | Connected Care).

Limitations of Thermal Imaging in Wound Care

While thermal imaging offers many benefits, it is not without limitations. Understanding these challenges is important when considering the implementation of thermography in routine wound care:

• Cost and Equipment: High-quality medical infrared cameras and integrated imaging systems can be expensive. Many wound care centers, especially in resource-limited settings, may find the upfront cost prohibitive. Although the price of infrared technology has been decreasing (and inexpensive smartphone attachments are now available), there is still a significant investment involved in obtaining devices that provide the accuracy and resolution needed for medical use. Additionally, devices like SmartMats or smart socks add to the cost of patient care, and insurance coverage for these technologies is still limited in many regions (Smart Socks to Catch Foot Injuries Early | DiaTribe) (Smart Socks to Catch Foot Injuries Early | DiaTribe). The cost factor can make thermal imaging less accessible to smaller clinics or those serving uninsured populations.

• Accessibility and Training: Even when the equipment is available, having staff trained to use it and interpret the images is crucial. Thermal images of wounds require careful analysis—clinicians must distinguish between normal post-operative inflammation and pathological infection, or understand how anatomic locations might have different baseline temperatures. Misinterpretation could lead to false alarms or missed diagnoses. Currently, thermography is not a standard part of medical or nursing education for wound care, so additional training and experience are needed. This creates a learning curve that some busy practices might be hesitant to undertake. Accessibility is also an issue for patients at home: not all patients can use a thermal camera or mat correctly on their own. Ensuring proper use (e.g., standing on a mat at the same time each day, in a room with stable temperature) might require patient education and support. If used incorrectly, the data from thermal devices can be unreliable.

• Technical Constraints and Standardization: Thermal imaging captures surface temperature and cannot directly measure deep tissue infection or perfusion; it infers these from surface changes. This means it might not detect a very deep infection until it affects the surface temperature. Additionally, external factors can influence skin temperature readings. Ambient temperature of the room, drafts, recent activity (e.g., if a patient just removed their shoes or had their leg elevated), and even skin moisture can affect the thermogram. For accuracy, standardized protocols are needed: the wound area often should be uncovered and exposed to room air for a few minutes to equilibrate before imaging, and the imaging should take place in a room without extreme temperatures or airflow. Not all clinical settings have a controlled environment for this, and variability could reduce the reliability of readings. Some studies explicitly performed thermography in temperature-controlled rooms to ensure data consistency ( Is Thermal Imaging a Useful Predictor of the Healing Status of Diabetes-Related Foot Ulcers? A Pilot Study - PMC ). If these controls are not in place, there’s a risk of inconsistent results.

• Limited Field of View and Depth: Small, deep wounds or wounds covered by dressings pose a challenge. Thermal cameras provide a 2D image of the surface; if a wound is very deep but narrow, the surface might be cool (due to dead tissue) even though an abscess is brewing underneath in the tissue. In such cases, thermography might underestimate the problem. Likewise, a large dressing or cast would need to be removed to take a thermal image of the wound, which might not always be feasible on every visit (though usually wound assessment requires removal of dressings anyway). There’s also the issue of resolution: cheaper thermal cameras have lower image resolution, which can make it hard to pinpoint small areas of temperature change, especially in smaller ulcers. Higher resolution cameras exist but are more costly.

• False Positives and Specificity: Not every temperature difference signifies a serious issue, which means clinicians must use thermography judiciously to avoid false positives. For example, an increase in temperature around a wound could simply be due to normal inflammation of healing (the body’s natural response) rather than an infection. If over-interpreted, this could lead to unnecessary interventions like unwarranted antibiotic use or patient anxiety. The flip side is also true: a chronically inflamed wound might always appear “warm,” potentially masking new infection if one only relies on absolute temperature. Thermography by itself cannot diagnose infection; it can only suggest it. As one report noted, “none of these images would be enough to identify infection alone” – meaning that thermographic data must be combined with clinical examination and possibly other tests (like swab cultures or blood tests) for a definitive diagnosis (New pocket-sized device to quickly spot infected wounds • healthcare-in-europe.com). In essence, thermography is a complementary tool, not a standalone diagnostic. Wound experts recommend viewing thermal imaging as one piece of the puzzle: a valuable piece, but one that must be interpreted in context. This need for complementary data can be seen in new devices that merge modalities (for instance, the Swift Ray 1 device combines thermal imaging with fluorescence imaging of bacteria, so that information on bacterial load and heat can together improve diagnostic accuracy for infection (New pocket-sized device to quickly spot infected wounds • healthcare-in-europe.com)).

• Reliance on Baseline Comparisons: Some thermal assessment techniques rely on comparing the affected area to another area (like the opposite limb or adjacent skin). As mentioned, comparing one foot to the other is a common method in diabetic foot care to spot hotspots. However, this approach fails if both feet are affected or if the patient has systemic issues causing bilateral changes ( Is Thermal Imaging a Useful Predictor of the Healing Status of Diabetes-Related Foot Ulcers? A Pilot Study - PMC ). In such cases, it can be hard to establish what a “normal” temperature is. Advanced analysis techniques are being developed to address this (like focusing on the wound vs. periwound temperature gradient instead of a distant reference (ThermoHuman)), but these are not yet standard. Clinicians must be aware of this limitation; if a patient has two ulcers, thermography might need to rely on absolute temperature values and trends over time, rather than side-to-side comparison.

Despite these limitations, it’s worth noting that technology is rapidly improving. The cost and size of thermal cameras are coming down, making it more feasible to equip clinicians and even patients with these tools. Clinical protocols and interpretation guidelines are being refined as more studies publish data on what thermal patterns correspond to infection, healing, or other conditions. Many limitations (such as environment effects) can be mitigated with proper technique (e.g., acclimatizing the patient’s limb to room temperature before imaging). Moreover, the benefit-to-risk ratio of thermal imaging remains high: it is a non-contact, radiation-free modality that, at worst, provides extra information that might be noise, but at best can be limb- or life-saving. As with any new technique, there is a learning curve and need for standardization, but these challenges are steadily being addressed through research and clinical experience.

Companies Advancing Thermal Imaging in Wound Care

Several companies and research groups are actively developing practical applications to bring thermal imaging into mainstream wound care. These range from startups focusing on smart home monitoring devices to established medtech firms integrating thermography into clinical wound assessment tools. Below is a list of notable companies and their contributions:

• WoundVision – An early pioneer in advanced wound imaging, WoundVision offers the Scout™ device, which combines a digital camera and a long-wave infrared camera into one solution for wound assessment. The WoundVision Scout captures regular photographs of the wound (for size measurement and documentation) alongside thermographic images of the skin (The WoundVision Scout™ | WoundSource). This allows clinicians to measure wound dimensions and detect “hot” or “cold” areas in one go. WoundVision’s system is used in hospitals to improve pressure injury documentation and to identify patients at risk for pressure ulcers by scanning for areas of increased heat (which can indicate tissue stress before a pressure sore forms) (The WoundVision Scout™ | WoundSource) (The WoundVision Scout™ | WoundSource). By integrating with electronic medical records and providing objective data, it aims to reduce subjectivity in wound monitoring and catch complications like deep tissue injuries early. WoundVision has published case studies showing that thermal imaging on admission can flag existing pressure injuries that might not be visible, thus helping facilities avoid preventable worsening of these injuries and related costs.

• Podimetrics – Podimetrics focuses on diabetic foot ulcer prevention and monitoring. Their flagship product, the Podimetrics SmartMat, is a home-use mat that veterans and other patients step on daily for foot temperature scans. The mat automatically detects asymmetric hotspots on the feet that indicate inflammation. According to the VA, the SmartMat can identify developing foot ulcers “as early as 5 weeks before they appear,” allowing early intervention (VA’s Remote Temperature Monitoring Program Prevents Diabetic Limb Loss | Connected Care). Podimetrics has leveraged decades of research showing that temperature monitoring can prevent ulcers (Using Thermometry for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Prevention). The company pairs the technology with a monitoring service, so when the mat finds an alert, a healthcare provider is notified to follow up with the patient. This model has shown success in reducing serious diabetic foot complications and is being implemented in large healthcare systems like the U.S. Veterans Health Administration. Podimetrics is actively researching improvements to their algorithms to reduce false alerts and is advocating for broader insurance coverage of preventative temperature monitoring given its proven benefits in cutting ulcer-related costs.

• Siren – Siren is known for its “smart socks” – comfortable, machine-washable socks embedded with tiny temperature sensors throughout the fabric. The idea is to continuously monitor the foot temperature of high-risk diabetes patients in a seamless way. The sensors in the Siren Socks take frequent readings and send the data to a smartphone app; if one part of the foot shows a significantly higher temperature than the corresponding part of the other foot, the system alerts the patient and clinicians of a potential issue (Smart Socks to Catch Foot Injuries Early | DiaTribe) (Smart Socks to Catch Foot Injuries Early | DiaTribe). Siren’s approach makes monitoring very user-friendly (since wearing socks is part of daily life) and has been validated in clinical trials demonstrating that such temperature monitoring can catch ulcers early. They are actively developing newer versions and working on integrating the data into clinical care pathways. The company’s efforts represent an important push toward making thermal monitoring available in the home setting for continuous, real-time prevention of diabetic ulcers.

• Swift Medical – A digital wound care company from Canada, Swift Medical provides wound tracking software (Swift Skin & Wound) widely used in healthcare facilities (Innovation Assessment – Digital Wound Care | Life Sciences). In collaboration with researchers, Swift has developed a device called Swift Ray 1, a small attachment for smartphones or tablets that enables advanced wound imaging (New pocket-sized device to quickly spot infected wounds • healthcare-in-europe.com). The Swift Ray 1 captures three types of images: standard photos, infrared thermography, and ultraviolet-induced fluorescence (to visualize bacteria) (New pocket-sized device to quickly spot infected wounds • healthcare-in-europe.com). By combining thermal imaging with bacterial detection, Swift’s technology helps clinicians differentiate between non-infected inflammation and true infection in a wound (New pocket-sized device to quickly spot infected wounds • healthcare-in-europe.com) (New pocket-sized device to quickly spot infected wounds • healthcare-in-europe.com). This comprehensive approach addresses one of the known limitations of thermography (its low specificity for infection when used alone) by adding another layer of data. Swift Medical is testing this device in clinical studies (as referenced in Frontiers in Medicine, 2023) and plans to roll it out as part of their wound management platform. The integration into a smartphone makes it highly accessible – clinicians can take a thermal image at the bedside with a device they already carry. Swift’s work exemplifies how startups are innovating to make thermal imaging practical and informative for everyday wound care, especially in telehealth or home care scenarios.

• MolecuLight – A company originally known for its fluorescence imaging device that visualizes bacteria in wounds, MolecuLight (based in Toronto) has recently secured funding to add thermal imaging and 3D wound measurement capabilities to its product line (Wound care device maker MolecuLight secures $39.5 million CAD from UK-based Hayfin | BetaKit) (Wound care device maker MolecuLight secures $39.5 million CAD from UK-based Hayfin | BetaKit). MolecuLight’s current device, i:X, is handheld and widely used to detect high bacterial loads in chronic wounds via violet light fluorescence. With the planned addition of an infrared camera, the device will also capture thermographic images, giving clinicians a two-in-one view of both bacteria and heat patterns. This will enhance the ability to identify infected wounds and assess perfusion in tissue. The company’s push into thermal imaging indicates the growing recognition of its value. By incorporating thermography into an established wound imaging device, MolecuLight aims to provide a more comprehensive point-of-care tool for wound assessment. Their active research and development in this area will likely bring an FDA-cleared thermal imaging feature to many wound clinics that already use their devices. It’s a sign that thermal imaging is moving from an experimental stage toward being a standard component of wound diagnostic technologies.

• Spectral MD – Spectral MD is a medtech company that has taken a slightly different approach by using multispectral imaging and AI for wound assessment. Their device, called DeepView, captures images of a wound at multiple wavelengths, including infrared, to analyze tissue health and predict healing outcomes (Innovation Assessment – Digital Wound Care | Life Sciences) (Innovation Assessment – Digital Wound Care | Life Sciences). Aimed originally at burn wounds and diabetic foot ulcers, DeepView’s AI algorithms can determine which areas of a wound have good blood perfusion and which are likely to need additional treatment (for instance, identifying which burn areas will not heal without grafting). Spectral MD has reported high accuracy in clinical studies for predicting wound healing, boasting around 86% diagnostic accuracy in identifying wounds requiring advanced intervention (Innovation Assessment – Digital Wound Care | Life Sciences). While not purely a thermal imaging company, Spectral MD’s work is relevant as they are actively researching thermal signatures among other signals to guide wound care. Their success underscores the role of infrared data in improving clinical decision-making. As of 2022, the company received recognition (like the European Mediscience Award) for its technology (Innovation Assessment – Digital Wound Care | Life Sciences), and it continues to refine its models on chronic wounds including DFUs. Spectral MD represents how combining thermal imaging with other modalities and AI can push the envelope in wound care diagnostics.

These are just a few of the notable players; other companies and research labs around the world are exploring thermal imaging for wounds. For example, researchers have developed prototype smartphone-based thermography apps, and some hospitals are experimenting with infrared cameras to monitor surgical wounds for infection. The involvement of companies like those above is accelerating the translation of thermography from research into practice. Each is addressing different facets: from hospital-grade devices (WoundVision) to home preventive tools (Podimetrics, Siren) to integrated mobile tech (Swift, MolecuLight) and AI-driven analysis (Spectral MD). This multifaceted development is a positive sign that thermal imaging is gaining traction. As these solutions become more widespread, wound care clinicians will have access to better tools to visualize and quantify what’s happening under the surface of wounds, leading to faster interventions and better healing outcomes for patients.

Conclusion

Thermal imaging is proving to be a valuable adjunct in the management of diabetic and vascular ulcers, offering a window into aspects of wound healing that were previously hard to measure. By detecting subtle temperature changes, it enables early identification of complications like infection or deteriorating circulation, often before they manifest visibly. This early warning can trigger timely interventions that prevent minor issues from escalating, ultimately safeguarding patients from severe outcomes such as amputations. Thermal imaging also provides an ongoing measure of a wound’s healing progress, allowing clinicians to tailor treatments based on the wound’s physiological response rather than just its appearance. For patients with diabetic foot ulcers and vascular ulcers, this means more proactive and personalized care – interventions can be ramped up or scaled back with greater confidence, potentially shortening healing times and improving comfort.

Of course, thermal imaging is not a panacea; it must be integrated thoughtfully, considering its limitations in cost, availability, and interpretation. The technology is most effective when used in conjunction with, not in place of, standard wound care practices and clinical judgment. As with any emerging tool, there is a need for continued research, user training, and refinement of best practices. Encouragingly, ongoing innovations by various companies are addressing many of the current limitations, making thermal imaging more accessible and user-friendly. As these innovations take hold, we can anticipate that infrared thermography will become a more routine part of wound assessments – whether it’s a nurse using a handheld thermal camera during a clinic visit, or a patient stepping onto a smart mat each morning at home.

In advocating for the adoption of thermal imaging in wound care, the evidence so far suggests clear benefits in detecting early trouble, guiding treatment decisions, and improving outcomes for chronic ulcer patients. The visual nature of thermography also engages patients in their own care; seeing a thermal image can help them understand their condition (for instance, identifying a hotspot they need to offload or keep clean), thereby improving adherence to care plans. As healthcare moves toward more data-driven and preventive approaches, thermal imaging aligns perfectly with these goals by providing real-time, actionable data. The future of wound healing may well be “heated” – in a positive sense – as thermal imaging helps to light the way towards faster healing and healthier patients. By embracing this technology alongside traditional methods, clinicians can significantly enhance the quality and efficacy of wound care for those suffering from diabetic and vascular ulcers.

References

Bharara, M., Cobb, J. E., & Claremont, D. J. (2006). Thermography and thermometry in the assessment of diabetic neuropathic foot: a case for furthering the role of thermal techniques. The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds, 5(4), 250-260. ( Is Thermal Imaging a Useful Predictor of the Healing Status of Diabetes-Related Foot Ulcers? A Pilot Study - PMC )

Kumar, D. K., et al. (2019). Is thermal imaging a useful predictor of the healing status of diabetes-related foot ulcers? Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 13(5), 869-876. ( Is Thermal Imaging a Useful Predictor of the Healing Status of Diabetes-Related Foot Ulcers? A Pilot Study - PMC ) ( Update on the Use of Infrared Thermography in the Early Detection of Diabetic Foot Complications: A Bibliographic Review - PMC )

Lavery, L. A., Higgins, K. R., Lanctot, D. R., et al. (2007). Home monitoring of foot skin temperatures to prevent ulceration. Diabetes Care, 30(1), 14-20. ( Is Thermal Imaging a Useful Predictor of the Healing Status of Diabetes-Related Foot Ulcers? A Pilot Study - PMC )

Ramirez-GarciaLuna, J. L., et al. (2023). Infrared thermography in wound care for the detection of infection and assessment of healing: a clinical study. Frontiers in Medicine, 10, 1165281. (New pocket-sized device to quickly spot infected wounds • healthcare-in-europe.com) (New pocket-sized device to quickly spot infected wounds • healthcare-in-europe.com)

van Netten, J. J., et al. (2023). Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Prevention, Diagnosis, and Classification. IWGDF Guidelines. (Using Thermometry for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Prevention)

Villacastín, J. (2024). Thermography and its application in wounds/burns. ThermoHuman Blog. (ThermoHuman)